Newsletters have shifted to a quarterly format, please subscribe to get the latest direct to your inbox.
Coming Soon! Please check back a little further into the quarter for the latest updates. CLOSE THIS ISSUE
Oct. 4, 2022
The brutal selloff continues
There is still no end in sight to rate hikes, which is the single most important factor in the equity markets this year, even with all the macro issues going on. Rising rates are like a giant wet blanket draped over everything, limiting growth, increasing expenses, reducing the present value of future cash flows, and driving multiple contractions.
The recent hawkish commentary by Chair Powell seemed to surprise many, who were thinking that rate hikes might be winding down later this year. However, the Chairman made clear that the Fed will do anything necessary to combat inflation and the current narrative is that rate hikes will continue. There is essentially nowhere to be in either equities or bonds to avoid the pain that the rate hikes are causing and even the traditional “60/40” equities/bonds portfolio is down approximately 20% year-to-date.
Still an expensive market
Broadly speaking, bear markets tend to last 12-18 months and drop somewhere around 40% in value. Clearly, we are not there yet, and there is an old saying “in a bear market the guy who wins is the guy who loses least.” Recently I have been taking that to heart and raising cash, even for investors with lengthy time frames. Over time, markets tend to swing from overvalued to undervalued and even with 2022’s 25% drop (S&P 500) and 32% (Nasdaq) through September I think the major indexes are still expensive.
It would be unusual for a bottom to be in given many of the other indicators, such as the VIX (which measures volatility and hasn’t come anywhere near where it’s been in prior bear markets), and Buffett’s “market cap to GDP” ratio is still well above prior highs. In addition, the strengthening US Dollar will eat into the earnings of companies that have significant overseas operations, which is the case for several of the large cap tech companies.
Some silver linings
A few (possible) bright spots: 1) we have already taken a significant amount of froth out of the market and are steadily transitioning away from an overbought and highly liquid market; 2) the “migration to all things digital” theme is alive and well, if the CEOs of these companies are to be believed, and 3) the long end of the yield curve continues to trade below 4%, and in many commodities inflation has completely rolled over. For instance: gold is down 15%, lumber down 60%, copper down 30%, iron ore down 60%, DRAM down 45% and crude oil down 35%. Some freight rates have dropped nearly 75% from their peak.
Most importantly, select hyper growth names in a number of portfolios are well above their mid-year lows and I believe that the trends behind their growth will persist even in a recession. Among them: Bill.Com (“BILL”) is +47%, Cloudflare (“NET”) is +42%, Sentinel (“S”) is +37%, CrowdStrike (“CRWD”) is +26% and Datadog (“DDOG”) is +9%.
These companies are growing rapidly at scale with significant recurring revenues and were the first to correct last year. As such I would expect them to be the first to stabilize as well, provided their fundamentals continue to hold up. Valuations have come way down, from (roughly) 50x Enterprise Value/Forward Revenues to (roughly) 14x. This is not to say they can’t fall further, but cloud/cyber security is (and will continue to be) a priority for every company in the world and I think portfolios should have exposure there.
Meanwhile, the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ both closed at new lows at the end of the quarter.
Some history
Currently there is a healthy debate about whether the Federal Reserve has already gone too far and will be cutting rates next year. An example of that took place in 1995, after the Fed had doubled the Fed Funds rate from 3% in January 1994 to 6% in January 1995 and then began cutting rates in July 1995. After closing at 459 on December 30, 1994, the S&P 500 subsequently closed 1999 at 1469.
As Warren Buffett has said “Every decade or so, dark clouds will fill the economic skies, and they will briefly rain gold. When downpours of that sort occur, it’s imperative that we rush outdoors carrying washtubs, not teaspoons. And that we will do.”
On the other hand, there have been lengthy periods of sideways movement as well. For example, the DJIA closed 1964 at 874 and closed 1981 at 875.
My takeaway is that as long as the narrative remains that the Fed will continue on its path there will be pressure on equities. When the perception is that that narrative is winding down, I would expect a significant bounce in equity prices overall. However, there’s no telling when that will be and while most portfolios currently have significant amounts of cash, being entirely out of the market risks missing the first 25-35% bounce as the market will turn well before the economy does.
A few specifics
According to Cathy Wood the global advertising industry is a $150bn market ($70bn in the US) and yet despite the ongoing migration to CTV (Connected TV) and streaming, only 22% of ad spend is directed there. My favorite company in the space is the Trade Desk (“TTD”) and I expect to continue owning it.
Electric vehicles are increasingly popular and even with the 22% drawdown this year, Tesla (“TSLA”) has been a huge winner for Peattie Capital portfolios. I think TSLA is light years ahead of the competition and production and sales continue to ramp, even though over the weekend TSLA reported September sales which were about 4% below street expectations. Shares traded down 8% on that news Monday (10/3), but nonetheless I expect that TSLA will remain a core holding in most portfolios.
Umicore is an $8bn Belgian company which specializes in materials of many types and has an extensive battery and battery recycling operation. To me it is a “back-door” way to play the exploding demand for electric vehicles. In June, Umicore announced a $5bn capital spend program, and shares have dropped 27% this year. So far, I only own Umicore shares in small amounts in a few portfolios, but this is one I will be watching closely and hope to own more.
A couple concluding thoughts
Some other tangential issues are that the mid-term election year is clearly the weakest year for equities in the four -year Presidential cycle, however it tends to do a little better after the mid-term elections are over in early November. The 3rd year tends to be the best.
In addition, I expect there will be plenty of tax loss selling this year which could present some attractive long-term opportunities. For right now I continue to be very cautious, but I have a list of companies I’m interested in and think it’s pretty likely that some of that cash will be deployed before year end.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions or comments.
Bill
CLOSE THIS ISSUE
June 28, 2022
An extraordinary six months
It’s been an extraordinary six months. No matter the asset class, size, location,
or industry (except energy and large cap pharmaceutical companies) it’s been a bloodbath, with nowhere
to hide. According to Cathy Wood of Ark Research, the bond market’s overall performance is
its worst since 1788 (source: Ark Research monthly update, May 10, 2022. Note: I have been
unable to confirm this). Even my most conservative accounts, which are almost entirely in cash,
are down high single digits. While that may look relatively good, when inflation is 8%, the
purchasing power of that cash is dropping rapidly.
As of June 24 close, the S&P 500 and Nasdaq are down 18% and 26% respectively, and most
Peattie Capital accounts are down in line with the markets. More aggressively positioned ones
are down even more. Peattie Capital Management manages separate accounts only, and tailors
portfolios based on specific client goals, constraints and risk tolerance.
That said, the S&P 500 is now trading at roughly 15x forward earnings estimates, down from
approximately 22x, and near where the P/E multiple has bottomed in previous corrections (a
couple times in the 13-14x range). There’s no telling if that will be the case again, however, as
in a recession earnings will drop. For example, $240 of S&P earnings and a 17 multiple gets the
S&P 500 to 4,150. However, in a recession, current estimates are likely too high and if they are
only $225, a 14 multiple produces an S&P of 3150.
This is not 2000-2002 when terrible companies with little more than eyeballs coming to their websites (think Pets.com) flourished. Nor is it 2008/09 when the financial system itself came
under extreme pressure. 2022 is rather a changing environment after 40 years of declining
interest rates and oceans of liquidity from the Federal Reserve at any sign of trouble, topped off
by the extraordinary liquidity provided in response to Covid.
It’s important to remember that after the six rate hikes from early 1994-early 1995, which took the Fed Funds rate from 3% to 6%, the Fed eased shortly afterwards and in the subsequent five
years the S&P 500 gained 34%, 20%, 31% 26% and 19% respectively.
Taming inflation through higher rates is still the Fed’s plan
Chairman Powell’s comments (so far) suggest to me that he will continue to raise rates to
combat inflation and is willing to risk a recession to achieve that goal.
Already recessionary signs are appearing as aggregate demand is softening, and the commodity complex is rolling over. Among others, copper is down 19% from its March high, aluminum
down 36%, nickel 47%, the CRB (Commodity Research Bureau) metals index is down 16%, and
lumber is down 60% (Source David Rosenberg June 20, 2022).
Also, corporate bond spreads are widening, and consumer sentiment is at all-time lows, both of which indicate heightened concerns about a recession. An inverted yield curve is usually a good
indicator of a recession and while that hasn’t happened yet, it is very flat as US Treasury yields
from one year out to 30 years range from 2.80% - 3.30%.
One silver lining of a recession is that it might compel Chairman Powell to withhold further rate hikes. If that happens, or the market believes the Fed will pivot, it’s reasonable to expect a
stronger market. In addition, massive selloffs like we’ve seen create very attractive
opportunities, especially for long term investors. For example, leading homebuilders like D.R.
Horton and Lennar are down over 40% this year and currently trade at only 4x their 2022
earnings estimates. Steel companies Cleveland-Cliffs (2.8x) and Steel Dynamics (3.3x) are even
cheaper.
An oil comment
As far as I’m concerned, oil is an important key to inflation as oil and inflation have gone hand in hand in the past.
According to David Rosenberg (Early Morning with Dave June 21, 2022), from December 1986-
October 1990, oil rose about 125% and inflation rose from 1.1% to 6.3%. From October 2006-
July 2008 oil rose again by 125% and inflation jumped from 1.3% to 5.6%. In the current cycle,
oil has risen roughly 110% and inflation has soared from 1.4% to 8.6%. The prior two times a
recession followed the oil spike and this time we have a Federal Reserve raising interest rates as
well.
I have avoided chasing the oil story and in June Chevron has dropped 20%, Exxon 18% and
Devon 32%.
What’s next?
The risk of “selling everything” today is that the market will turn very quickly and powerfully, and selling would also beget the question of when to get back in. As Warren Buffett has
famously said, “if you wait for the robins, spring will be over.” Furthermore, many clients still
have enormous unrealized capital gains, and selling everything would trigger a big tax bill next
spring for many.
For now, I expect to remain focused on companies where I have my highest conviction, and for the past few years, the most widely held names across Peattie Capital portfolios have been
Microsoft (“MSFT”), Alphabet (“GOOG”) and Apple (“AAPL”). Based on what I know today, I
expect to continue owning them.
Regardless of oil/inflation, I still believe that emerging technologies (electric vehicles, genomics, e.g.) the migration to all things digital, and the emergence of cloud computing provide the best
opportunities for long-term capital appreciation. As Eric Savitz wrote (Barron’s June 20) “As recent earnings reports from Amazon, Microsoft and Alphabet made clear, demand for cloud-based computing services is both vast and expanding. The promise of the cloud - improved flexibility and reduced costs - is fundamentally changing the way every company handles computing.”
A few accounts own small positions in several high growth tech companies which specialize in data management and cyber/cloud security. I mentioned these companies in the Q1
newsletter, and while they are still down significantly for the year, they were first to correct last
fall, and have now bounced 40% or so from their recent lows. I believe the macro headlines are
masking some of the extraordinary developments and trends taking place right now.
For some accounts I have also begun sprinkling in some short positions and other hedges. In
theory this sounds simple, but in practice the timing can be very difficult as bear markets
typically have extraordinarily powerful brief rallies.
For more conservative accounts I continue to have a big cash position and own a variety of very large blue-chip companies like Eli Lilly (“LLY”), Johnson and Johnson (“JNJ”) and Pepsi (“PEP”),
among others. One name I’m considering is Stanley Black and Decker (“SWK”) which is down
50%, trades well below the market’s and its own long term multiple, and has paid dividends
every year since 1876. In addition, for the first time in many years I have also begun buying
select fixed income such as 6-month Treasury bill which closed Friday yielding 2.44%.
A few examples of growth companies
BYD Holdings (“BYDDY”) is a Chinese electric vehicle manufacturer which recently discontinued manufacturing combustion engine cars. BYD focuses on the lower end of the market, and I
particularly like that it manufactures its own batteries and semiconductors. Tesla just signed an
agreement purchase batteries from them, and Warren Buffett has been a large shareholder for
many years. BYD is expanding aggressively into Europe and already sells electric buses in the
US.
Datadog (“DDOG”) provides security and data access in the cloud and is my favorite of the high growth companies I own. Revenues grew 84% and 83% the past two quarters, with free cash
flow margins of 33% and 36% respectively, and it is profitable ($0.66 latest twelve months). No
doubt revenue growth will slow, but with 80% gross margins and a net retention rate of 130,
DDOG looks like a name to continue owning as long as cloud computing continues to grow
quickly.
Invitae (“NVTA”) has the most upside of any company I know right now. Shares peaked at $60
in late 2020 and closed Friday just above $3. NVTA is working on integrating genetics into
mainstream medicine and sells genetic tests in a variety of clinical areas, most notably cancer.
In the Q1 earnings call, NVTA stated that they expected revenue of $650mm in 2022,
representing 40% growth over 2021. They also discussed their success in reducing spending
and expect overall expenses in the $600 million to $650 million range this year. NVTA doesn’t
expect profitability for another two years, so they are focused on cash management. This is a
highly speculative situation and not for every client, but the cost to sequence the human
genome has dropped significantly as has the time required to do it. NVTA has important
genetic data which they think will extend and save lives and is a forerunner of the future of
health care.
I don’t own companies for their takeover potential, but a recent Jefferies report highlighted that the combined market cap of all biotech stock with less than a $5b market cap was roughly
$350 billion, and the combined cash balance of the top 20 biopharma companies was
approximately $300 billion. Said another way, those 20 companies could almost buy every one
of the smaller ones.
Late last year an analyst at SVB Leerink estimated that the 18 largest US and European
biopharma companies will end 2022 with approximately $500 billion in cash. The analyst,
Geoffrey Porges, concluded those companies would have $1.72 trillion of M&A capacity.
Conclusion
Some of the sentiment indicators I follow haven’t reached the panic levels they’ve reached in other bear markets, so that gives me pause. However, the large cap leaders are growing double
digits, have defensible businesses and are generating mountains of cash. For example, GOOG is
expected to grow revenues 15% or more the next few years and trades about in line with the
overall market. GOOG has an active buyback program and at the end of Q1 had $135 billion of
cash on the balance sheet.
Very soon we will be seeing more inflation data, and a bond market with yields anchored in the 3% range suggests to me that inflation isn’t as entrenched as many fear. The market hates
uncertainty more than anything and any comments from Powell clarifying his intentions could
help reduce that uncertainty. For now, the narrative remains that we currently are facing
recession or inflation, and until that narrative changes, there could be more pressure on share
prices.
All that said, the very best opportunities and returns are created in times like this, when there are concerns and good companies as well as bad ones have been discarded. This is an
opportunity for good stock picking to shine, and I remain excited about the prospects for
Peattie Capital companies.
CLOSE THIS ISSUE
April 2, 2022
Ouch!
The volatility (read: massive selling) that began for Peattie Capital’s preferred companies in 2021 accelerated in the first quarter of 2022, resulting in painful drops in portfolio values, particularly for the more aggressively positioned ones, which are down low/mid double digits. More conservatively managed portfolios are down low single digits.
Regardless of headlines, digitalization marches on
My basic belief remains that the global digital overhaul is still growing rapidly, and that growth is being masked somewhat by the preponderance of today’s macro issues. In one of my research groups, a tech CEO said (paraphrasing) “every great business will become a technology company.” It’s hard to disagree with that as every company in every industry in the world needs a variety of technology products and services, and that need is only growing. Companies that are not investing appropriately in technology will be at a distinct competitive disadvantage going forward.
I continue to favor companies that are well positioned to participate in the growth of all things digital, and I think that, over time, the selloff in growth/disruption companies that began last year will prove to be a buying opportunity.
That said, reminder here that Peattie Capital manages separate accounts, and any number of clients have portfolios geared more towards preservation of capital or income rather than growth. Those portfolios own a combination of dividend payers, and names in more defensive industries like consumer staples and health care.
On October 16, 2008 the NY Times published a letter from Warren Buffett in which Buffett outlined the importance of owning equities, and his preference to buy them when others were fearful. His letter came in the middle of the financial crisis, but his advice is timeless for any investor. In the first quarter alone, Berkshire Hathaway announced three significant investments totaling nearly $20 billion, which were in Activision, Occidental Petroleum, and Alleghany Insurance. No doubt Buffett puts his money where his mouth is.
Difficult first quarter everywhere
For the year, the S&P 500 has returned -4.9%, and the NASDAQ -9.1%. Through Friday, March 25, the average stock in the Russell 3000 index had dropped more than 30% (source: Financial Times March 28, 2022). The past 12 months have been terrible for bonds as well as the Bloomberg aggregate bond index has lost 8% (Source: Bloomberg). At some point bonds will represent value and it’s possible some portfolios will begin to hold some form of fixed income assets. For now however, bonds remain “return-free risk.”
Energy and other commodities have been the only real performers of 2022 but my belief remains that their recent surges will ultimately lead to some combination of demand destruction, and/or oversupply, possibly simultaneously. A few energy producers are talking about holding off on increasing production, and it remains to be seen if that discipline holds.
Interest rates are critical and there are precedents for sharp rate hikes: 1994
Until recently, one puzzling aspect of the past few months has been the stubborn refusal of the bond market to retreat; that is for yields to rise…despite the Federal Reserve’s warnings about potential rate hikes since November and the surge in a variety of commodity prices. Only after Chairman Powell’s speech on Monday the 14th, when he spoke about a variety of hikes and amounts, did the bond markets really begin selling off in earnest.
So far 2022 reminds me of 1994, when the Federal Reserve, chaired by Alan Greenspan, began a tightening cycle with a 0.25% (25 basis points) hike in February, and subsequently raised by 25 basis points again in March and then again at an emergency meeting in April. In May and August they raised by 50 basis points and in November by 75 basis points. The final hike was at the end of January, 1995, and it was for 50 basis points, bringing the targeted rate to 6%.....a doubling of the initial 3% rate in less than 12 months.
The S&P dropped 1.5% in 1994, the NASDAQ 3.2%, and the US aggregate bond market lost 2.4% (Source: Bloomberg). However the Fed reversed course and cut rates in both July and December 1995 and the S&P 500 gained 34.1% and 20.3% respectively in 1995 and 1996. The NASDAQ roared back with gains of 39.9% and 22.7% in those two years.
Going back even further, under Chairman Paul Volker the Fed raised rates in 1980 to the 19-20% range to combat inflation, and the S&P 500 dropped 10% in 1981. According to the Stock Trader’s Almanac, over the years 1946-1949, the S&P 500 was -3.5% in aggregate, going from 17.36 at the end of 1945 to 16.76 at the end of 1949. Scott Minerd, co-founder and CIO of Guggenheim Partners, recently wrote (Financial Times March 21) that that period is similar to today, as post-war supply shortages combined with soaring money growth and a rebound in both consumer and industrial demand to trigger inflation fears.
None of this is to predict what the Federal Reserve will do in 2022, but as examples of the steps they’ve taken and how markets have responded in the past. Today the Fed is both reducing its balance sheet and raising rates, both of which are effectively “tightening” maneuvers. My sense is that the choppy action we’ve had since last fall will continue, and the major risk to near-term stock prices is that the tightening, which appears highly likely to continue, could go too far and trigger a recession. The flattening yield curve suggests the bond market thinks that’s a possibility.
Back to the present
I mentioned in my January letter my reluctance to sell many positions as a number of them had tremendous capital gains and also because I liked them as long term investments. Home Depot comes to mind, and also Adobe, which I first bought over six years ago when it was trading around $90. Subsequently shares peaked near $700 last year. In the recent selloff, shares traded below $500, and when the company reported quarterly earnings a week ago shares traded down to about $425. Meanwhile the fundamentals remain strong, although there is more competition and revenues and earnings are not growing nearly as fast as they had been.
ADBE is one of the original “Software as a Service” (“SaaS”) companies in which a subscription model replaces a one-time product sale. In their quarterly reports, SaaS companies usually include “ARR” (annual recurring revenues) and are required to provide “RPO” (remaining project obligations) which give investors an indication of future revenues. Investors reward this (somewhat) predictable and recurring revenue picture, sometimes very significantly. SaaS companies have a degree of stickiness and visibility that others do not which is one reason they tend to be very richly valued.
Two leading areas in software today are security and data management. It stands to reason these two trends will continue, given the explosion of data being created daily and the connectivity between devices. Most portfolios have a small exposure to one (or more) of the leading software security companies, each of which uses the Saas model and are very expensive by traditional metrics. I expect them to be especially volatile, but think it important to own some companies in this space.
In addition, I’ve added shares of Datadog to many accounts, which is also a Saas company and helps clients harness and interpret data. The same aforementioned tech CEO cited in a recent podcast the example of using a credit card to buy a coffee at Starbucks, stating that in the half second it took for that transaction to be approved 300 different data transactions took place behind the scenes. Datadog grew revenues 84% in 2021 and has guided to 80% gross margins. There appears to be little/no competition, according to the CEO’s comments in the February conference call.
Additionally, most portfolios own (and have owned for several years) the well-known large tech names such as Alphabet, Microsoft, and Apple, among others. They will not be immune from market fluctuations, but for now I see no reason to sell them. Fundamentally they remain very strong with entrenched positions in large and growing markets, and opportunities to extend into new markets. In addition, they are generating huge amounts of free cash. Possibly the biggest risk to them is regulatory risk, but my belief is that breaking up say, Amazon or Alphabet would enhance shareholder value, at least in the near term. In the meantime, estimates are that Alphabet, for example, will grow earnings 15% or more the next several years and yet it trades in line with the overall market at about 20x.
A few closing thoughts
One other interesting item that I read (and haven’t confirmed independently) is that within 18 minutes of Tesla’s 6 a.m. March 28 announcement of its intention to split its stock again shares added $65bn of value, or basically the market cap of both Ford and GM. I don’t know how to demonstrate the increasing involvement of bots and algorithmic/AI trading but I absolutely believe that it is real and drives share prices significantly. Several of the world’s largest companies have announced splits, and the shares have bounced immediately, even though a split by itself does not change the value of the company.
Another good (and brief) read is Jeff Bezos’ letter to Amazon shareholders in 2001 after Amazon shares dropped 80% in 2000. In it, Bezos lists many of Amazon’s accomplishments and the progress the company was making, such as the rapid addition of new customers, and the decrease in some costs as the company scaled. A friend of mine bought $50,000 of shares around then and when I last spoke to him a few months ago he still hadn’t sold any of them.
My takeaway is that the internet has changed the way the world works and continue to provide investment opportunities in many ways. Staying the course and owning the right companies over time will prove to be a wonderful wealth-generating strategy in the years to come.
Questions and comments are always welcome.
CLOSE THIS ISSUE
Previous Years' Newsletters
|